A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between potential neighbours over the development of the wall at a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted countrywide consideration subsequent an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones home at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of organizing breaches, environmental concerns, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Moments article about René Collier plus the Irish Occasions report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has developed right into a highly publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about construction functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a company director respectively, look for to build their household property. The case has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, exactly where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of founded people. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted less than scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their planning authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries in their web page, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal staff has characterised the motion as an try and delay or frustrate a lawful development. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding so as to preserve their look at, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal preparing disputes, where by views of The ocean are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable efforts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Moments, an image that has since come to be emblematic with the depth in the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up meant to Get visual evidence from the wall’s place relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site with the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two men entered the drinking water throughout critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the website turned Just about the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of steps were being cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a location impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The situations René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been covered intimately from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard further more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt design pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential moment inside the authorized timeline.
With the core of the dispute is really a disagreement above boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as made, goes over and above what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has become described as meticulous in his evaluation of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by concern for environmental protection and adherence to arranging law. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public see, insisting as an alternative that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they may have explained their lengthy-standing connection to the region and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple merely attempting to develop a family members household in accordance Along with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches over a Exclusive Spot of Conservation and say that every one operates happen to be performed dependant on professional advice and approved options. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as moving into the sea throughout a storm, never change the fundamental information.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how arranging disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute around construction of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the situation that a lot of observers see as more and more widespread. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now extra contentious.
The Irish Situations write-up about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Earlier been linked to area advocacy on organizing and environmental concerns, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from very different Qualified backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, became synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily truth of the coastline and also the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result continues to be unsure. The courtroom ought to identify whether or not the wall as constructed complies with preparing authorization and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Specific Space of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who should live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have already been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building will work at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probable go on to look in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent times.